
Home Page, Contact Us, Recent Articles, Statement of Client's Rights and Responsibilities, Site Map, Immigration Matters, Espanol
Bankruptcy, Frozen Bank Accounts and Wage Garnishment, Chapter 7 Overview, Chapter 13 Overview, Mortgage Foreclosure, Discharging Taxes in Bankruptcy, Discharging Student Loans in Bankruptcy, Why Credit Card Debt Consolidation Does Not Work, Bankruptcy for Creditors
Business, Buying and Selling a Business In New York State, Commercial Lease Negotiation in New York State, Liquor License Procurement in New York State
Recent Articles by
The Law Offices of Neil E. Colmenares, P.C.
Top 10 Misconceptions About Bankruptcy
"We the People" Services have "No Value"!
What Every Lawyer Should Know About Bankruptcy
Bankruptcy: What Every Broker and Banker Needs To Know
We explain the Misconceptions about Bankruptcy and tell you why not to go to We the People. Bankruptcy Lawyers in Nassau, Queens, Long Island & New York.
Top Ten 10 Misconceptions About Bankruptcy
By: Neil E. Colmenares, Esq.
Bankruptcy
is everywhere. Bankruptcy affects everyone including, but not limited to,
Debtors, Creditors, Lending Institutions, Accountants, Financial Analysts,
Mortgage Brokers, Real Estate Agents, All Types of Lawyers, Potential Homebuyers,
Owners of Real Property, The President of the Bank of Mom & Dad, etc.
Therefore, an understanding of the Bankruptcy Code and the principals enunciated
therein are essential for every professional involved in the financial affairs
of individuals and businesses. Bankruptcy law is extremely complex and, like
other specialties, takes a significant investment of time to master. The purpose
of this article is not to make you an expert in Bankruptcy law. This article
is intended merely to apprise the practicing professional of various misconceptions
about Bankruptcy that arise in every day practice. As with any area of the
law, you should seek the advice of an experienced attorney before taking any
action.
There are several misconceptions about Bankruptcy that every professional should be aware of. I will attempt to dismiss the most blatant misconceptions. Here is my Top 10 list of Common Bankruptcy Misconceptions.
1. The debtor 1 must be flat broke to file for Bankruptcy.
Nothing can be further from the truth. With limited exceptions, the only requirement
to file for Bankruptcy is that the Debtor can not pay their bills as they
come due. This makes sense when given some thought. If a person had to be
flat broke to file for Bankruptcy, that person would not be able to pay their
attorney which would lead to a proliferation of pro se Debtors which would
clog the Courts and drive the entire Bankruptcy Court system insane.
Secondly, once this "flat
broke" Debtor has completed their Bankruptcy, they would in all likelihood
become public charges since they have nothing left to live on. To avoid this
burden on the government, Congress has permitted "exemptions" to
allow Debtors to keep a certain amount of property despite the Bankruptcy
filing. A person filing for Bankruptcy in New York is permitted to have, among
other things, up to $2,500.00 in cash, $2,400.00 worth of equity in an automobile
as well as unlimited funds placed in a qualified 401K plan.2
Finally, because individuals and businesses normally wait till they are flat broke to seek Bankruptcy advice, this unnecessary delay precludes options available to them which may help them reorganize their finances and permit them to keep part or all of their property. For example, an individual normally waits till the day before a foreclosure sale to seek Bankruptcy advice where had they sought advice earlier, their chances of losing the property would have been diminished significantly.
2. If an individual files for Bankruptcy, his/her credit will be ruined
and (s)he will not qualify for credit in the future.
A blatant lie! The fact that an individual files for Bankruptcy will appear
on the individual's credit report for up to ten years. While this may seem
draconian, this is not as bad as it may seem at first flush.
First, if an individual is considering
filing for Bankruptcy, their credit is probably not that great to begin with.
Filing for Bankruptcy may be their best bet to "get good credit"
again. Why you ask? The rationale is simple. When a Debtor files for Bankruptcy
under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code and receives a discharge3,
a Debtor can not receive another discharge under Chapter 7 for at least eight
(8) years.
So, for example, pretend that you
are the head of a credit card company in charge of deciding to whom to extend
credit and you have two identical applicants with one exception, one of the
applications filed for Bankruptcy three months ago. Who would you extend credit
to? Applicant #1 who never filed for Bankruptcy and who could file for Bankruptcy
at any moment after taking your money thereby discharging your debt? Or would
you extend credit to Applicant #2 who filed for Bankruptcy three months ago
and who recently received a discharge under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code
thereby insuring that your loan can not be discharged under Chapter 7 for
at least the next eight (8) years?
The answer is simple, in the above hypothetical, the person who recently filed for Bankruptcy is the better credit risk because an individual can receive only one discharge under Chapter 7 every eight (8) years. This, in practice, results in the individual who filed Bankruptcy last week receiving dozens of new credit card offers!
3. If an individual files for Bankruptcy, they can not buy a house in the
future.
Another lie. Like all lending institutions, they are willing to take risks
with Debtors if they have enough security. This normally means charging higher
interest rates as well as personal guarantees. Remember the bottom line here:
lending institutions are looking to make money just like everyone else. If
a person who had filed for Bankruptcy in the past applies for a mortgage and
that individual has a significant enough down payment, banks will be tripping
over themselves to extend credit (i.e.- a mortgage) to that individual.
4. If an individual owns a house and files for Bankruptcy, (s)he will lose
the house.
Yes and no. An individual in New York is allowed to keep the first $50,000.00
in equity in their homes above all liens and encumbrances despite the Bankruptcy
filing (the exemption is $100,000.00 for joint Debtors). This is called the
"homestead exemption." Lets look at a couple of common scenarios:
"The individual is current
on the mortgage, there is little equity in the property and has a lot of credit
card debt." Let's assume that the property is worth $500,000.00 and there
is a mortgage of $450,000.00 on the property. In this instance, that individual
can file for Chapter 7 and still keep their house.
Let's change the facts a bit. Let's
say the same house is worth $500,000.00 but the individual has a $410,000.00
mortgage on the property. After we take into consideration the $50,000.00
homestead exemption, the individual is left with $40,000.00 in non-exempt
equity. If this individual files for Chapter 7, the trustee4
in the case will sell the property and the individual will be given the first
$50,000.00 from the proceeds. The point that needs to be emphasized in this
scenario is that the individual will lose the house under Chapter 7 unless
after the filing of the Bankruptcy the individual can come up with $40,000.00
to pay the trustee the non-exempt equity. These funds can come from a post-petition
mortgage or a loan from family and/or friends.
"The individual is behind on their mortgage, there is substantial equity in the property and has a lot of credit card debt." In this scenario, assuming the individual has a regular source of income and after payment of their regular monthly bills (the mortgage payment not including arrears, gas, electricity, food, etc.) assuming there is money "left over," if this left over money can satisfy the arrears on the mortgage over a period of not to exceed five years, the individual may be able to keep the house in Chapter 13. Chapter 13 is quite complicated but its principle is simple. As long as the individual repays the debt, they can keep the property. This may be an oversimplification but I believe the point to be well taken.
5. Taxes can not be discharged in Bankruptcy.
Wrong! Certain taxes are dischargeable in Bankruptcy such as certain personal
income taxes that are more than three years old if certain requirements are
met. As a general rule, fiduciary taxes are not dischargeable. The Bankruptcy
Code's provisions relating to taxes are quite complex and differ depending
on the Chapter filed under but suffice it to say, certain taxes are dischargeable.
6. Student loans are non-dischargeable.
Generally speaking this is true. However, like every other rule there are
exceptions. If the Debtor can prove certain hardship, these student loans
may be dischargeable. This is normally an uphill battle but certainly not
impossible.
7. An individual can file for Bankruptcy but not include certain creditors
in the Bankruptcy.
Untrue, unlawful and fraudulent. One of the principles behind the Bankruptcy
Code is to treat similarly situated creditors equally. When a Debtor does
not list a creditor in their Bankruptcy and decides to pay back that creditor,
that Debtor is necessarily prejudicing the other creditors. If a Debtor does
this, the Court considers this fraud and the Debtor can risk losing their
discharge and in extreme circumstances face jail time as well as a hefty fine.
8. If I have to list all creditors in the Bankruptcy, I will end up cheating
my mom by discharging the money she loaned me.
Although a Debtor must list all their creditors in the Bankruptcy, in certain
instances the Debtor can repay certain creditors after the Bankruptcy is filed.
This is commonly known as a reaffirmation agreement. All reaffirmations are
subject to court approval. The reason most Debtors agree to pay back a debt
they have no legal obligation to pay is to maintain an existing business relationship.
In this instance, the court would probably approve the reaffirmation if the
Debtor lives with mom and worries that mom may throw him out if he does not
pay up.
9. I signed a piece of paper stating I can not get rid of this debt in
Bankruptcy and it is therefore non-dischargeable.
This is yet another scare tactic. Although the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2005
has modified this somewhat, there are state law remedies available. Consult
with your Bankruptcy Attorney about these provisions.
10. I could lose my job if I file for Bankruptcy.
If you lose your job, you can sue your boss! The law states that if an individual
can prove that an employer fired an employee solely because the employee filed
for Bankruptcy, the employee can sue the employer. As a caveat, if the Debtor/employee
looks for another job after the filing of the Bankruptcy, the potential employer
can use the Bankruptcy filing as a factor (not the sole factor) in deciding
whether to give that individual employment.
As the above information indicates,
there are a lot of misconceptions about Bankruptcy. As a professional, you
are perhaps in the best position to advise your clients regarding their financial
condition. Most people and business owners are generally in denial about their
financial situation. It normally takes the intervention of a professional
to apprise Debtor that they need help or the Creditor that they have rights.
This is analogous to a person with a physical illness. The sooner they seek
help, the greater the chances for a speedy recovery.
As professionals we have fiduciary duties incumbent upon us that can be at
times overwhelming. If we exercise these duties responsibly and take care
to advise our clients of potential problems and things they can do now to
stave these problems off, we will be in their eternal gratitude as well as
helping society as a whole. But if we fail, then we will continue to perpetuate
derogatory stereotypes and have failed not only ourselves, but our clients
who have come to us for help.
*The Bankruptcy Abuse and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 has changed a number of the provisions from the former Bankruptcy Code. It is suggested that you contact an attorney to discuss your specific situation.
Editor's Note: Neil E. Colmenares, Esq. concentrates on the complex area
of Bankruptcy law and is in private practice with offices in Queens, Nassau,
and New York Counties.
1 A "Debtor" is an individual or entity that
owes money. The Bankruptcy Act of 1898 which was replaced by the Bankruptcy
Code of 1978 substituted the term "Bankrupt" for "Debtor."
One of the reasons for this change in nomenclature was to help remove some
of the social stigma involved in filing Bankruptcy. Remember, we are all Debtors
but we are not all Bankrupts.
2For a complete list of exemptions for Debtors who are
domiciled in New York, see the New York CPLR Sections 5205 and 5206, New York
Debtor and Creditor Law Sections 282 - 284 and the New York Insurance Law
Sections 3212 - 3213.
3A discharge is a court injunction relieving the Debtor
of the obligation to repay most debts and preventing creditors from collecting
for same.
4A "Trustee" is a person appointed by the
Court to administer the Debtor's estate. The Trustee's main function is to
sell the Debtor's non-exempt property and use the proceeds to pay creditors.
E-mail: help@nycounselor.com
| Queens Office: | Nassau Office: | Manhattan Office: |
| 45-15 Union Street | 231 Mineola Blvd | 450 Seventh Avenue, Suite 802 |
| Flushing, NY 11355 | Mineola, NY 11501 | New York, NY 10123 |
| (718) 888-3108 | (516) 739-7272 | (212) 563-2222 |
Internet Office: For those who cannot come to one of our offices in person, we offer full service via the Internet, e-mail, telephone and facsimile. Click here to begin your Internet case.
We explain the Misconceptions about Bankruptcy and tell you why not to go to We the People. Bankruptcy Lawyers in Nassau, Queens, Long Island & New York.
Call today to schedule a consultation.
"We the People" Services have "No Value"!
In a recent decision of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York, the Court held that "We the People" engaged in the unauthorized practice of law, committed fraudulent, unfair and deceptive acts, and rendered services that had no value.*
The truth about "We the People" is that they are a typing service. "We the People" are not lawyers! Court documents do not have to be typed. Why pay several hundred dollars to someone to type forms? The motto "No Lawyers Save You Money" should be taken with a grain of salt. People end up losing their valuable assets by going to typing services instead of qualified lawyers. Their motto should be "No Lawyers Cost You A Lot More Money." See the attached Court decision about one of the victims of "We the People."*
With so much on the line, why go to someone who is not a lawyer to solve your legal problem. If you were in an accident, broke several bones and lying on the floor bleeding, would you call an herbalist? Of course not, a sane person would call a doctor. So if you have a legal problem, why go to someone who is not a lawyer to solve your legal problem?
It is my sincere belief that typing services like "We the People" have no value and do not benefit the hard working people whose money they take. Do not just take my word, look at the attached summary opinion by a Bankruptcy Judge stating that "We the People" render services that have no value.*
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY
COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------x
In re: PHYLLIS GAFTICK, Chapter 7 Debtor. Case No.: 1-04-20061-dem
---------------------------------x
DECISION AND ORDER
On July 8, 2004, Phyllis Gaftick ("Gaftick") filed
a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. On
March 18, 2005, a joint application for Orders pursuant to Section 110 of
the Bankruptcy Code (the "Application") in which they sought sanctions
against We the People of Sheepshead Bay, New York, Inc. ("WTP- SB")
and We the People Forms and Service Centers USA, Inc. ("WTP- USA")
(collectively, the "Respondents"). Specifically, the Movants sought
an order: (1) directing WTP- SB and WTP- USA to disgorge (give back) fees
pursuant to Section 110(h)(2); (2) directing WTP- SB and WTP- USA to cease
conduct which amounted to the unauthorized practice of law; and (3) finding
that WTP-SB and WTP-USA committed fraudulent, unfair or deceptive acts pursuant
to Section 110(i).
[T]he Court finds that the services the Respondents (We the People) rendered
to Gaftick had no value and directs that (i) the Respondents disgorge Two
Hundred Twenty-Nine Dollars ($229.00) to Gaftick under Section 110(h)(2) (ii)
of the Bankruptcy Code. The Court further finds that the Respondents (We the
People) collected a money order in the amount of Two Hundred Nine Dollars
($209.00) from Gaftick made payable to the Bankruptcy Court for the filing
fee in connection with the Debtor's bankruptcy petition and directs that WTP-SB
and WTP-USA shall be fined, jointly and severally, Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00)
for violating Section 110(g)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code. The Court finds that
the Respondents (We The People) committed fraudulent, unfair, and deceptive
acts when they (i) advertised that their bankruptcy services cost One Hundred
Ninety-Nine Dollars ($199.00) when in fact their services cost Two Hundred
Twenty-Nine Dollars ($229.00); (ii) charged Gaftick a fee of Fifteen Dollars
($15.00) for a process server although a process server was not used and (iii)
deceived Gaftick into believing that she was required to have the Respondents
photocopy her petition.
[I]t is well settled that "[t]he giving of legal advice and counsel,
including instructions and advice as to the preparation of legal instruments,
constitutes the practice of law."
However, the act of simplifying the bankruptcy process and forms "leads
to the exercise of judgment by the Bankruptcy petition preparers in how best
to accomplish that result, which in turn inevitably crosses the line by giving
potential debtors guidance and advice on how to fill out the forms."
In addition, these forms may also "lead a debtor to choose incorrectly
how to treat his or her property." An example of this occurred in the
present case when Gaftick was led to claim her cash in her bank accounts as
exempt, not realizing that this exemption pertained only to exempting a portion
of the "earnings" she had received in the last sixty days.
Here, the Respondents' legal advice to choose the exemption under NYCPLR §5205(d)(2)
caused Gaftick to have to retain counsel to correct this error on her schedules,
confused her creditors and caused them to question her integrity when this
matter was revealed at the adjourned 341(a) meeting. It could have jeopardized
Gaftick's discharge if this error had not been caught and corrected in time.
Accordingly, the Court finds that the services the Respondents rendered to
Gaftick had no value to her.
DENNIS E. MILTON, United States Bankruptcy Judge
* This is a summary of this case. The full case can be downloaded
online at, http://www.nyeb.uscourts.gov/jud_opinions/dem/04-20061-20051031-WO.pdf
E-mail: help@nycounselor.com
| Queens Office: | Nassau Office: | Manhattan Office: |
| 45-15 Union Street | 231 Mineola Blvd | 450 Seventh Avenue, Suite 802 |
| Flushing, NY 11355 | Mineola, NY 11501 | New York, NY 10123 |
| (718) 888-3108 | (516) 739-7272 | (212) 563-2222 |
Internet Office: For those who cannot come to one of our offices in person, we offer full service via the Internet, e-mail, telephone and facsimile. Click here to begin your Internet case.
Call today to schedule a consultation.
We explain the Misconceptions about Bankruptcy and tell you why not to go to We the People. Bankruptcy Lawyers in Nassau, Queens, Long Island & New York.
What
Every Lawyer Should Know About Bankruptcy
By: Neil E. Colmenares, Esq.
Bankruptcy is booming in America!
Each year seems to bring record consumer and business Bankruptcy filings.
Bankruptcy, although considered a specialty, is quite broad in nature and
affects almost every area of the law. Therefore, an understanding of the Bankruptcy
Code and the principals enunciated therein is essential to everyone involved
in the practice of law. Bankruptcy law is extremely complex and, like other
specialties, takes a significant investment of time to master. The purpose
of this article is not to make you an expert in Bankruptcy law. This article
is intended merely to make the non-Bankruptcy lawyer aware of various issues
that arise in various disciplines. Attorneys who practice in the areas of
Personal Injury, Matrimonial, Landlord/Tenant, Criminal Law, Real Estate,
Trusts and Estates, Business Law, Collections and Commercial Litigation matters
should take special note of the Bankruptcy related issues in their practice.
The purpose of the Bankruptcy Code
is twofold. First, the Bankruptcy Code is intended to give the honest but
unfortunate debtor a fresh start. Secondly, the Bankruptcy Code provides a
system of paying creditors via the liquidation of the debtor's non-exempt
assets or through a structured repayment plan. As one would imagine, these
competing interests often collide with the force of a hurricane.
There are five chapters of the
Bankruptcy Code. Starting with the most popular, Chapter 7 is a liquidation
of the Debtor's non-exempt assets. Chapter 13 is a repayment of all or part
of the debts of an individual with regular income. Chapter 11 is a reorganization
of a business but is also, though less frequently, available to consumer debtors.
Chapter 12 is similar to Chapter 13 but available only to Family Farmers.
Chapter 9 is the adjustment of debts of Municipalities.
Which Chapter of the Bankruptcy
Code an individual files under should be carefully considered by an experienced
Bankruptcy Attorney. Each Chapter has its pros and cons and one size certainty
does not fit all. The importance of familiarity with all the Chapters of the
Bankruptcy Code can not be over emphasized. Filing a Bankruptcy for a client
without first explaining all their options under all the Chapters of the Bankruptcy
Code can lead to court sanctions and a malpractice suit from the client!
The moment a Bankruptcy petition
is filed, a "Bankruptcy estate" is created which consists of all
legal and equitable interests of the Debtor that existed on the date the petition
was filed. When a debtor files for Bankruptcy, an "automatic stay"
goes into effect. This automatic stay, with exceptions, is immediate and stops
all collection efforts on property of the estate. The purpose of the automatic
stay is to give the Debtor "a breathing spell" from their creditors.
The automatic stay is also meant to protect creditors by creating an orderly
liquidation or repayment procedure which obviates the need for a race to the
courthouse to collect outstanding debts. The automatic stay suspends creditors
claims so that they may be administered by the Bankrupt estate. Finally, the
automatic stay does not prevent collection of post-petition debts so long
as collection is not from property of the Bankrupt's estate.
As previously noted, there are exceptions to the automatic stay. These exceptions
permit the excepted Creditor to go about their business as if the Bankruptcy
Petition had never been filed. The United States Congress decided that certain
"public policy" interests override the need for the automatic stay.
These exceptions are so important that every practicing attorney should have
familiarity with them.
Some of the most important exceptions
to the automatic stay are as follows: commencement or continuation of criminal
proceedings against the Debtor; the commencement or continuation of an action
to establish paternity; the establishment or modification of an order for
alimony, maintenance or support (as distinguished from property settlements);
the collection of alimony, maintenance or support from property that is not
property of the estate; the commencement or continuation of criminal proceedings
against the Debtor; actions by a governmental unit to enforce its police or
regulatory power for health, safety or welfare of the community.
So much for the automatic stay.
Once the Debtor is in Bankruptcy, the Bankruptcy estate must be administered.
This is accomplished in different ways depending on the Chapter of the Code
the Debtor filed under. Each Chapter brings with it a myriad of possibilities
and nuances that counsel should be aware of. The following is a brief synopsis
of how cases are administered under the various Chapters.
Under Chapter 7, non-exempt assets
are liquidated by a court appointed Trustee to pay creditors who have filed
timely proofs of claims according to the priority set forth in the Bankruptcy
Code. If a Creditor fails to file a timely proof of claim, they are prohibited
from partaking in the estate! A word of caution is in order here. The knee
jerk reaction to file a proof of claim should be avoided and careful consideration
must be taken before filing a proof of claim. The filing of a proof of claim,
generally speaking, subjects the creditor to the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy
Court. This jurisdiction may or may not have been present before the filing
of the proof of claim. In certain cases, the filing of a proof of claim can,
inter alia, waive a creditor's right to a jury trial!
Administration of a Chapter 13
case is somewhat different than Chapter 7. In Chapter 7, anything acquired
by the Debtor after the filing of the petition is not considered property
of the estate. Under Chapter 13, on the other hand, until the final payment
under the confirmed plan is made, all property of the Debtor acquired both
pre-petition and post-petition are considered property of the estate. Under
Chapter 13, the Debtor submits a plan of repayment for part or all of their
debts over a period of not to exceed five years. Once the Bankruptcy Court
"confirms" the Debtor's plan, all creditors are bound by the plan
regardless of whether the Debtor continues making payments under the plan!
Chapter 13 has some interesting
features that the other Chapters do not. For example, there is a Co-Debtor
stay that acts as a stay against the commencement or the continuation of a
civil action against an individual that is liable with the Debtor. Chapter
13 also provides for a "Super Discharge" of debts that are otherwise
non-dischargeable in a Chapter 7 proceeding such as debts resulting from a
willful and malicious injury. Finally, Chapter 13 allows a Debtor to withdraw
the petition. This is in contrast to Chapters 7 and 11 which require court
approval.
Chapter 11 administration is time
consuming and cumbersome. Unlike Chapter 13 where a Debtor submits a plan
of reorganization to the court and can be confirmed over the objections of
creditors, under Chapter 11, the Creditors must vote on a plan of reorganization
before the plan can be confirmed by the Court. This often leads to innovative
methods of negotiations between the parties.
The goal of a Bankruptcy is to
receive a discharge. A discharge forever prohibits a creditor from collecting
or attempting to collect discharged debts. The discharge injunction allows
the honest but unfortunate debtor to realize their fresh start. Which debts
are discharged depends on the Chapter of the Bankruptcy Code upon which the
discharge was granted.
A discharge under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code, as stated supra, discharges
debts that are otherwise non-dischargeable in Chapter 7 such as debts resulting
from a willful and malicious injury. Under Chapter 7, certain debts are excepted
from discharge such. This non-exhaustive list includes debts for certain taxes;
debts that are in the nature of alimony, maintenance or support; debts for
most student loans; debts for most fines, penalties, forfeitures or criminal
restitution obligations; debts for personal injuries or death caused by the
Debtor's operation of a motor vehicle while intoxicated; some debts which
were not properly listed by the Debtor; debts that the Bankruptcy Court specifically
has decided or will decide are not discharged; debts for which the Debtor
has given up the discharge protections by signing a reaffirmation agreement
in compliance with the Bankruptcy Code requirements of debts.
In Chapter 11 cases, a corporation
does not receive a "discharge." Rather, when the plan of reorganization
is confirmed, the confirmed plan bounds all creditors by the terms provided
for in the plan which may include less than full payment for outstanding debts.
Finally, shareholders of a bankrupt corporation enjoy limited liability under
state law from the corporation's unpaid claims.
As the above mentioned information
illustrates, Bankruptcy law is extremely complex and the practice thereof
should be undertaken only by an attorney who has manifested a commitment to
this complex area of the law. Former Judge Marvin Holland of the Eastern District
of New York Bankruptcy Court, when speaking of non-Bankruptcy Attorneys practicing
in Bankruptcy Court, said it most succinctly: the Bankruptcy Court is "occasioned
by a small minority of lawyers who are ill- trained, unseasoned, unmotivated,
and undedicated; lawyers who have practiced only in state courts and who blindly
assume that procedure in this Court [Bankruptcy Court] is identical to that
to which they are accustomed; lawyers with the temerity to represent a client
in need before a court of highly-specialized jurisdiction and procedure without
first having familiarized themselves with the basic fundamentals of bankruptcy
practice." In re: REFINE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., 175 B.R. 827 at 831.
The Attorney in this case was subsequently sanctioned. Id.
It is my sincerest hope that this article will help the non-bankruptcy attorney spot issues that arise in their respective practices and thereby avoid a possible court sanction or malpractice claim.
*The Bankruptcy Abuse and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 has changed a number of the provisions from the former Bankruptcy Code. It is suggested that you contact an attorney to discuss your specific situation.
E-mail: help@nycounselor.com
| Queens Office: | Nassau Office: | Manhattan Office: |
| 45-15 Union Street | 231 Mineola Blvd | 450 Seventh Avenue, Suite 802 |
| Flushing, NY 11355 | Mineola, NY 11501 | New York, NY 10123 |
| (718) 888-3108 | (516) 739-7272 | (212) 563-2222 |
Internet Office: For those who cannot come to one of our offices in person, we offer full service via the Internet, e-mail, telephone and facsimile. Click here to begin your Internet case.
Call today to schedule a consultation.
We explain the Misconceptions about Bankruptcy and tell you why not to go to We the People. Bankruptcy Lawyers in Nassau, Queens, Long Island & New York.
Bankruptcy: What Every Broker And Banker Needs To Know
By Neil E. Colmenares, Esq.
Most mortgage brokers and bankers
are under the false impression that bankruptcy has little or no effect on
their practice. There could be nothing further from the truth! Brokers and
bankers, more than almost any other profession, are directly affected by bankruptcy.
Because so few are aware of the process, they end up losing a tremendous amount
of business out of ignorance. This article has been written to familiarize
lay brokers and bankers with the knowledge needed to identify when bankruptcy-related
issues are before them and the appropriate action to take to earn their fee.
The bankruptcy process generally
affects mortgage brokers and bankers in one of two ways:
The first general scenario is when
a broker is considering or about to procure a loan for a potential homebuyer.
In this scenario, the broker has worked diligently to procure the loan but,
much to their chagrin, finds that the seller has fallen behind on the mortgage
payments and is in foreclosure. When faced with this situation, most brokers/bankers
normally cut their losses and run the other way, while chastising themselves
for not having discovered this fact earlier. However, an astute broker/banker
who has read this article will see an opportunity to earn a fee.
When faced with this situation,
as a broker/banker, you are in a position to be levelheaded and make a decision
that can save the day for everyone involved. If a modification, forbearance,
refinance or a second mortgage is not possible or practical, bankruptcy may
be an alternative.
Let's assume that there is a foreclosure sale scheduled for the end of the
week. Assume also, that there is a buyer ready, willing and able to purchase
this home, but for various reasons cannot close on the property before the
scheduled foreclosure sale date. On the advice of someone who has read this
article, the financially distressed homeowner decides to hire a bankruptcy
attorney to file a Chapter 13 bankruptcy. In doing so, the foreclosure process
is stopped dead in its tracks. Although this may only be a temporary delay
in the foreclosure process, this delay may be long enough to consummate the
sale, prevent the financially distressed homeowner from losing their house
and prevent you from losing a commission.
How does Chapter 13 do this? The
filing of a Chapter 13 bankruptcy creates what is called an automatic stay
on the foreclosure process. In plain English, this means the foreclosure process
cannot continue unless one of several factors has been met. While a comprehensive
lesson on the bankruptcy code is beyond the scope of this article, it is sufficient
to say that no matter how the Chapter 13 bankruptcy turns out, the foreclosure,
at a minimum, is delayed long enough to give the homeowner some breathing
room. This breathing room can offer all interested parties an opportunity
to come up with creative solutions to the issue at hand.
It should be noted that Bankruptcy
Law is extremely complex and should be practiced only by an experienced bankruptcy
attorney. No one should ever file a bankruptcy petition without the representation
of an experienced bankruptcy attorney. Here is just one of the many reasons
why:
Let's say the homeowner goes to
bankruptcy court without an experienced bankruptcy attorney and mistakenly
files a Chapter 7 bankruptcy instead of a Chapter 13 bankruptcy. In this instance,
if there is equity in the property, the trustee assigned to the Chapter 7
bankruptcy case will sell the house without the homeowner's consent. This,
it goes without saying, does not benefit anyone. And, the homeowner who filed
the bankruptcy without an experienced bankruptcy attorney in an effort to
save a few dollars on legal fees has lost the home that they have worked for
their whole life and will be literally left out on the street in a relatively
short time. Finally, the commission that you may have been entitled to as
a broker or banker, will in all likelihood be lost forever. This is one of
many common mistakes made by both lay people and non-bankruptcy attorneys
when handling a bankruptcy case.
The same way that you wouldn't
go to a dentist when you're having chest pains, you should never go to anyone
who is anything short of a bankruptcy expert when you need bankruptcy counseling.
Real estate law is not the same as bankruptcy law. And any lawyer who has
a long laundry list of practice areas is, more likely than not, confirming
the old cliché, "Jack of all trades, master of none." When
there is so much on the line, you cannot afford to have anyone but an experienced
bankruptcy lawyer handling your case.
Let's examine the other side of
the coin. Say you are the bank that holds the mortgage in the above hypothetical
case. You have now learned that an automatic stay has gone into effect that
prohibits you from continuing the foreclosure process. What do you do now?
For too many of the smaller lenders, this normally means going to the foreclosing
attorneys who for the most part are not bankruptcy experts and who waste valuable
time figuring out what to do. For starters, they should advise you that any
actions taken to continue the foreclosure are usually void and can lead to
contempt charges being levied against you. At this point, you should immediately
file a "proof of claim" and depending on the bankruptcy chapter
filed, you may need to file a motion to lift the automatic stay and/or an
objection to confirmation. Let's take each of these steps one at a time.
The first thing that the mortgagee
should do is file a proof of claim. A proof of claim permits you to receive
money from the trustee (a court appointed person in charge of distributing
the bankruptcy estate) in the event that there is any money to be distributed.
Failure to file a proof of claim forbids you from receiving any money from
the trustee even though you may be entitled to it. For example, in the previous
hypothetical case where the homeowner accidentally filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy,
if there is any equity that the trustee would distribute to which you may
be entitled; your failure to file a proof of claim precludes you from receiving
any of that money. There are a hundred other reasons to file a proof of claim
but this is the most important.
Next, you may need to file a motion
to lift the automatic stay. Making a motion to lift the automatic stay will
allow you to continue the foreclosure process should that be in your best
interests. When a person files for bankruptcy, a bankruptcy estate is created
which encompasses all of the property that the debtor has an interest in.
Most importantly to you as the mortgagee, this includes the property on which
you hold a mortgage. Without making a motion to lift the automatic stay, you
cannot continue to foreclose.
The bankruptcy court will allow
you to continue the foreclosure process only under certain conditions. The
most common is what is called "lack of adequate protection." Adequate
what? Here again, an analogy is in order. Think of an ice cube. Imagine it
to be an exact size. This ice cube represents your interest in the property.
If after the filing of the bankruptcy, this ice cube shrinks in size, you
as the mortgage holder are not adequately protected. The bankruptcy court
could either lift the automatic stay or give you something else to make your
"ice cube" the same size it was just before the bankruptcy filing.
To illustrate, some examples of
lack of adequate protection include failure to pay post-bankruptcy filing
mortgage payments or not satisfying pre-bankruptcy filing mortgage arrears.
In these instances, the bankruptcy court will usually lift the automatic stay
to allow you to continue the foreclosure process and may in certain circumstances,
give you a replacement lien on some of the debtor's other property to get
your ice cube back to size. The possibilities here are endless, but suffice
it to say, prompt action after the filing of the bankruptcy will minimize
if not eliminate any risk to your interest in the debtor's property.
One more caveat-foreclosure attorneys
are not bankruptcy attorneys. The same principles described above for selecting
a bankruptcy attorney for a homeowner applies equally to lenders. Generally
speaking, foreclosure attorneys are swamped with work and do not possess anything
past a basic understanding of bankruptcy law. Once again, you should select
a bankruptcy attorney who practices predominately, if not exclusively in Bankruptcy
Law. Remember, every delay costs you money.
Finally, if the homeowner has filed
either a Chapter 13 or a Chapter 11 bankruptcy, you may need to file an objection
to confirmation. A little primer is in order here; Chapter 13 and Chapter
11 bankruptcies are reorganizations that in essence mean the homeowner proposes
a plan to pay back their debts within the parameters set forth in the bankruptcy
code. If this proposed plan does not take into account all of your rights
and you fail to object, you have, for the most part, waived your rights. Once
again, the possibilities here are endless but the point to remember is to
know your rights and protect them.
In closing, remember that both debtors and creditors have rights. This means you must know these rights to protect your interests. If you are unaware of these rights or fail to take affirmative steps to protect your interests, you can lose a tremendous amount of your investment, not to mention your fees. I hope this article helps and enables you to grow your business, and seize the opportunities that others do not see.
Neil E. Colmenares, Esq. is a Bankruptcy Law attorney and a principal in the New York-based Law Offices of Neil E. Colmenares, P.C. He writes articles on the complex area of Bankruptcy Law for various professional organizations, has taught continuing legal education courses to other attorneys on Bankruptcy Law and is a frequent lecturer for government-sponsored programs teaching entrepreneurs how to form and maintain businesses. He may be contacted by phone at (718) 888-3108, (516) 739-7272 or (212) 563-2222 or by e-mail at help@nycounselor.com.
*The Bankruptcy Abuse and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 has changed a number of the provision from the former Bankruptcy Code. It is suggested that you contact an attorney to discuss your specific situation.
E-mail: help@nycounselor.com
| Queens Office: | Nassau Office: | Manhattan Office: |
| 45-15 Union Street | 231 Mineola Blvd | 450 Seventh Avenue, Suite 802 |
| Flushing, NY 11355 | Mineola, NY 11501 | New York, NY 10123 |
| (718) 888-3108 | (516) 739-7272 | (212) 563-2222 |
Internet Office: For those who cannot come to one of our offices in person, we offer full service via the Internet, e-mail, telephone and facsimile. Click here to begin your Internet case.
Call today to schedule a consultation.
We explain the Misconceptions about Bankruptcy and tell you why not to go to We the People. Bankruptcy Lawyers in Nassau, Queens, Long Island & New York.
Home Page, Contact Us, Recent Articles, Statement of Client's Rights and Responsibilities, Site Map, Immigration Matters, Espanol
Bankruptcy, Frozen Bank Accounts and Wage Garnishment, Chapter 7 Overview, Chapter 13 Overview, Mortgage Foreclosure, Discharging Taxes in Bankruptcy, Discharging Student Loans in Bankruptcy, Why Credit Card Debt Consolidation Does Not Work, Bankruptcy for Creditors
Business, Buying and Selling a Business In New York State, Commercial Lease Negotiation in New York State, Liquor License Procurement in New York State
*Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
This web site and the related links are purely a public resource of general information and it is not intended to be nor is it a source of legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your specific situation. This information is generalized and should not be relied upon as legal advice. This communication does not create an attorney-client relationship.
IRS
CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE
To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that
any U.S. Federal Tax advice contained in this communication (including any
attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for
the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2)
promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter
addressed herein.
We are a debt relief agency. We assist people to file for relief under the Bankruptcy Code.